Question about ranged weapon damage range.
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:52 AM
I was looking at rhokdelar and the Gm 2.9 spd crossbow/weapon.
I noticed that the rhokdelar with 53.3 dps had a top end damage range of 201
At the same time, the GM 2.9 spd with a higher dps 55.9 only has a top end of 195.
I thought damage ranged was based off of weapon speed and DPS.
Can someone clarify how it actually works for me?
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:55 AM
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:56 AM
No, I understand that the DPS is lower. Im not arguing that. I thought weapon damage range was based off of dps and weapon speed. What is it based off of? Just some random guy deciding what he wants the damage range to be?
rhok has a higher low end.
Posted 05 January 2007 - 04:58 AM
Posted 05 January 2007 - 05:01 AM
Does the same thing go into effect with 2h weapons? Like is there a 53 dps 2h with 3.8 spd that has a better damage range then a 59 dps 2h with 3.8 spd?
DPS is based off of the range and speed.
Seems odd that it would work like that.
Posted 05 January 2007 - 05:43 AM
Posted 05 January 2007 - 06:03 AM
Posted 05 January 2007 - 06:27 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users