• Announcements

    • Maniq

      Forum Rules (Updated 3/22/14)   07/14/10

      Welcome to the Elitist Jerks forums, a WoW discussion forum targeted towards topics regarding high-end raiding and analysis of game mechanics. We ask you to take a few minutes to read the following before making use of these forums.   First, a point of clarification. The name of these forums is not intended ironically; we have high standards for the discussion that occurs herein, and we're quite unapologetic about it. If you feel our rules are stupid or arbitrary, we don't really care. If you don't wish to follow them, you're welcome to return to the official Blizzard forums.   Following is a brief listing of our forum rules; note that it is by no means exhaustive, as in our experience people are quite innovative in finding new ways to be stupid. These are simply a set of guidelines to get you started in the right direction. If you follow them, you will generally do fine here; however, if you concoct some creative new form of stupidity, our moderators feel no need to restrain themselves in letting you know. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly. In particular, all posts should be made in a reasonable approximation of proper English. We realize that a significant number of you are not native speakers, and we do not expect perfection: merely effort. Please obey basic rules of capitalization and punctuation, avoid chatroom abbreviations ("lol", "imo", "u", and the like), and pay at least minimal attention to sentence and paragraph structure. This includes not starting a new paragraph for each sentence. All opinions should be stated as succinctly as possible. Do not make multiple consecutive posts; rather, multi-quote and include all your ideas in a single post. Do not quote huge blocks of text to add a short reply; instead, quote only what you need to to make your point. Do not break a single quoted reply into multiple blocks; doing so needlessly lengthens your post without aiding its readability. And don't provide unnecessary backstory: if it isn't relevant to the question you're asking or the point you're making, we don't need to know about it. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Trolling or flaming in any form is forbidden. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are stupid or on drugs and their personal hygiene isn't really relevant to the discussion. Regardless of the merit (or lack thereof) of your argument, it should be made in a way that is neither insulting nor condescending. Whining in any form is forbidden. Blizzard is not incompetent or stupid and they are not intentionally screwing you over and neither is anyone else. If all you're going to do is complain, don't bother posting. Threads should be started if and only if there is some reasonable topic to discuss. If the issue you wish to discuss is covered in an existing thread, use it rather than creating a new one. If you are asking a simple question that you expect to have a simple answer, ask it in one of the "Simple Questions/Simple Answers" threads. But if you feel there is a topic of discussion not well-covered by existing threads, feel free to start a new thread to discuss it. Some sub-forums restrict new members from creating new topics unless they've made at least 10 approved posts, to prevent spamming or bad posts. If you really think it deserves a new thread before you have 10 posts, contact a moderator with your post content. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say. Do not bump, quote for truth, cross-post, or post only to say thanks. We don't want to hear your funny story about something that happened in your raid last night, your baseless speculation is unproductive, and your idea for a new ability really isn't that interesting. We don't care what gear you are hoping to get or just received. If you have an idea you'd like to share with the community, support it with analysis, testing, or both that indicates you've put some thought into it. (Note: Posting of a new untested spec falls under this rule, unless you have done the grunt work and have information to support your amazing new spec don't even bother posting it here.) Do not beg for hand-holding. These are forums for discussion and analysis, not for answering any question that you might happen to dream up. Search and read before posting--do not post a question unless you are fairly confident that the answer isn't widely known or easily attainable. In particular, we do not want to take a look at your armory or WWS to tell you what you're doing wrong and we're not interested in making your tough gear or spec decisions for you. We expect you to use the search function and also to read the first post as well as the last 5 pages of the thread you are posting in. Chances are your question has already been answered. Additionally, do not post asking for confirmation of a simulation result. If you think there is a problem with the Sim you are welcome to PM the author. All accounts must have a valid WoW profile. If you no longer play and have deleted all characters you used to have, you may select the "No WoW Account" option; otherwise, this information must be filled out for your main character. If you fail to observe this rule you'll be permanently banned from our forums. We do not permit anonymous posting. Do not sign your posts. People can see who you are from the profile printed to the left of each post, so signing your posts is redundant and simply takes up space. Similarly, you do not need to link your armory in your post, as if people wish to see it they can get it from your profile. Do not respond to terrible posts. Do not respond to a blatantly awful post (a post that is in clear violation of the rules) either in an attempt to moderate them or to answer a question they posed. Your post will just be warned/infracted and removed with the post you are replying to. If you feel that a post is in violation of these rules, please report it and the moderators will deal with it as we feel is appropriate. No Advertising. Do not make posts solely for the purpose of advertising your site/blog/twitch/etc. You may post such things if it's relevant and adds to discussion at hand. If you have information to share, share it here with a link back to your blog or whatever. Do not post "I have information, come to my site to get it". That will result in an immediate infraction and post removal. Also, we will remove any link to a site that violates a games TOS/EULA such as gold selling sites.

      If you violate a forum rule, you will receive an infraction. Most infractions are worth one point, although we reserve the right to give you more at any time if we feel you deserve them. If you accumulate too many infraction points, you will receive an automatic (usually temporary) ban which revokes your posting privileges, as follows: 3 Points - 1 Day 5 Points - 3 Days 8 Points - 1 Week 10 Points - 1 Month 15 Points - Permanent

      Familiarize yourself with The Banhammer, an archive of all infractions given by the moderators here; it will give you some examples of what not to do. Also feel free to take a gander over The Dung Heap, which will give you a good idea of what these forums would look like if we weren't such jerks.   Thank you for joining the discussion!


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Teleros

  • Rank
    Scarab Lord
  • Birthday 01/19/87

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location United Kingdom

WoW Profile

  • Character Name Teleros
  • Gender Male
  • Race Human
  • Class Paladin
  • Realm Ravencrest
  • Realm Location
  • Guild Alterac Deviants
  • Guild URL http://alteracdeviants.com
  1. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      Just to add to this, I tend to run Selfless Healer because of this kind of thing. ES / LH have 1min CDs, but you can do an instant Flash of Light every, what, 12-15 secs with Selfless Healer (Judgement is low in our priority list after all)? Sure it means the odd GCD lost for me, but on the other hand it means a decent amount of healing on someone in danger.   You can also consider going Clemency with the HoSac glyph - if your raid leader isn't using your Hand spells for anything on the fight then you can keep them free for emergencies.
  2. Ret FCFS Rotation Helper

      It should this for clcinfo:   eds5_fv   If I remember correctly, that's for an Empowered Divine Storm with the FV buff active & 5 HP banked. If you just mean using a DS after an FV in AoE situations, I can't recall if there's a DS_FV or similar option. Personally I just use my head for those situations though, because most boss fights are fairly light on AoE combat.
  3. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      The OP has a small typo in that it says "Exo with T16 4p..." rather than T17, but you'll note this places Exo + T17 below HoW even when you have the buff active & only 1-2 HP.   My clcinfo priority string is thus as follows: es tv_dp_4s eds5_fv tv5 ds5 how exo_bc cs j exo tv4 tv3
  4. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      Did another bit of testing in v603-13. Same rules as before, but with 2 different items owing to this change (note: I added in a custom shirt with the "missing" 95 haste to bring the % values in line). Swapped out the Seal of the Savage Howl for Phosphorescent Seal, and Thogar's Control Rod for Ka'graz's Burning Blade, and compared this with the standard Mythic gear (again, with bonus haste to allow for the haste buff). Finally, I did a test with Ka'graz's Burning Blade & Seal of the Savage Howl as a "low-Haste" set mid-way between the two options...   New Set: 39,400.6 DPS (range 4038 / 10.2%) /// Phosphorescent Seal, Ka'graz's Burning Blade Old Set: 39,440.2 DPS (range 4065.1 / 10.3%) /// Seal of the Savage Howl, Thogar's Control Rod Mid Set: 39,372 DPS (range 4164.6 / 10.6%) /// Seal of the Savage Howl, Ka'graz's Burning Blade   New Stat Rankings: Mas (3.62) >> Crit (3.15) >> MS (3.06) >> Vers (2.93) >> Haste (2.75) Old Stat Rankings: Mas (3.54) >> Crit (3.12) == MS (3.12) >> Vers (2.92) >> Haste (2.82) Mid Stat Rankings: Mas (3.54) >> Haste (3.17) >> Crit (3.09) >> MS (3.07) >> Vers (2.91)   New Stat Totals (Unbuffed): Mas (1492) >> MS (1162) >> Haste (952*) >> Crit (794) >> Vers (100, human racial) Old Stat Totals (Unbuffed): Mas (1619) >> Haste (1058) >> Crit (906) >> MS (831) >> Vers (100, human racial) Mid Stat Totals (Unbuffed): Mas (1614) >> MS (1064) >> Crit (906) >> Haste (813) >> Vers (100, human racial)   * The actual Haste on the gear is 857 haste rating. Divide by 90 to get 9.52%, which is 952 rating under the pre-haste-buff system. To make up the difference, I added a custom +95 haste enchant. Did the same thing (well, +96 rating :P ) for the others too.   Finally, a note that Str/Stam/etc are identical with both sets. All 3 profiles had 100,000 10min (no variation, elite skill, fully (de-)buffed, single target, 25ms latency, default 603-13 rotation / action priority list) sims done on them with a human paladin with PoJ, FoJ, Selfless Healer, Unbreakable Spirit, Divine Purpose, Execution Sentence and Final Verdict.   + + +   Well, now that you've made it this far, what's new?   Actually... nothing much, actually. The way Haste drops off the face of the Earth in stat rankings past a certain point can be clearly seen, but this buff to haste doesn't do anything for us this tier unfortunately.
  5. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

    Here's all the stat ratings from gear, from the sim results:   T17H Gear: Mas: 1445 Haste: 837 MS: 739 Crit: 806 Vers: 100 (human racial)   T17M Gear: Mas: 1619 Haste: 962 MS: 831 Crit: 906 Vers: 100 (human racial)   Hope it helps :) .
  6. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      They seem reasonably close to me. Quite a lot of combo choices, but it's a ~1400 DPS difference between the top (SW + Seraphim) and the bottom (DP + Emp Seals) numbers from Exemplar's post on the previous page, which seems okay - a 6-7% DPS difference in ideal circumstances is pretty good.   As for stat weights... yeah, I guess just use SimCraft a lot ;) . Based on the most recent figures for raiding gear above, you may want to default to mastery if you're uncertain about gearing, but as even in the above stuff the worst stat is at least 71% of the best secondary stat (T17N Mastery vs Haste, and that with gear setups that need fixing), I think that the worst case is likely to be "suboptimal stats" rather than "junk stats". So again, a pretty good case of balancing in my books.   + + +   Edit time...   Okay, did some comparisons between heroic & mythic gear - that is, identical mythic gear setups but different bonus ids (566 vs 567) for the heroic/mythic difference in quality etc (same legendary rings though, no Warforged gear etc). 25ms latency, elite skill, 600sec fights (no variation), all (de)buffs, and done by human paladins with DP+FV, behind the Patchwerk boss, identical default actions etc...   Heroic: 33,900 DPS Mastery: 3.14 Haste: 2.76 (87.90% of Mas) MS: 2.72 (86.62% of Mas) Crit: 2.72 Vers: 2.52   Mythic: 39,292 DPS Mastery: 3.52 MS: 3.10 (88.07% of Mas) Crit: 3.09 Vers: 2.90 Haste: 2.72 (77.27% of Mas)   + + +   Seems there's a pretty low effective haste cap for us at around 15% (FYI, raid-buffed haste was 13.79% & 15.10% respectively), at least with our T17 set bonuses etc. Once you reach that break point (BTW, the 15.10% haste = 9.62% unbuffed, or 962 rating), haste loses value for us rather rapidly, and MS/Crit become the preferred stats after mastery.   Didn't check weapon damage or strength, but I figure that as per previous results they're both well above the secondary stats, so go with those two regardless.   Hope this is all of use :) .
  7. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

    Haste still reduces our main rotation ability CDs, hence why it's still (just) the top secondary stat for us :) .
  8. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

    Nice work you two :) . For what it's worth I've been having a little look at raiding gear setups (seeing as we can't just reforge stats away anymore), and thought I'd make a start here:         Hope that all helps :)
  9. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

    Okay, apparently someone at Blizz read this and decided that the Glyph of IT needed a nerf to +30% SoT damage...   1. Assume 5308 av weapon damage & 2864 SP. Ignoring haste & multistrike (for now). 3.45 attack speed. 2. Average SoT swing (no IT glyph) will be 637 damage. Average Censure tick will be 945 at 5 stacks. 3. IT glyph = +30% SoT swing damage, so +191.1 per swing. 4. Total Censure damage = 4725 over 15 secs. 5. 4.34 swings per 15 secs = +829 damage. 6. 4.5 sec CD on CS = 3.33... CS swings per 15 secs = +637 damage. 7. Assume 2 TVs per 15 secs = +382 damage. 8. Assume 2.5 Js per 15 secs = +478 damage. 8. 478 + 382 + 637 + 829 = 2326. 2326 < 2362.5 (ie half of 4725).   Or just take the previous figure * 0.75 (2469 * 0.75 = 1848) then add Judgement's SoT procs for 2326 total damage.   TL;DR - Glyph of Immediate Truth is now a small DPS loss. Given that bosses often have air phases when your DoTs will continue doing damage but you can't keep swinging at them, I can only assume that Blizzard doesn't want us to use this glyph <_< . Or if they do, to keep it as a kind of "this player is bad - do not recruit" glyph :wacko: .
  10. Warlords of Draenor paladin discussion

    Build 18967 has the following for Ret...   -Seal of Righteousness up from 5% to 12% weapon damage. -Light's Hammer gets ~66% buff to damage & healing. -Holy Prism gets ~200% buff to damage & healing.
  11. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

    Seal Swapping macro: #showtooltip /castsequence [nomod] !Seal of Righteousness, !Seal of Truth   Simple enough, if you have SoT active it'll cast SoR, and vice versa.
  12. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      I hope it stays TBH: it's nice to have another glyph that's worth using some of the time. As you note though, any fight where we want to hit more than 1 target regularly means you probably shouldn't use the IT glyph, so there's room for players to min/max, experiment, and get away from the standard cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all-boss-fights builds.
  13. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

    Thanks for this - and I notice I forgot Judgement in my napkin maths, which will push things further in favour of IT glyph (2.5 Judgements per 15secs = 637.5 more bonus SoT / IT damage = 3106.5 > 2362.5).   Off-hand I'd say that crit & MS affect everything equally (eg no extra SoT swings from MS attacks), so ought to cancel out.   Good to see we've another useful glyph to use in 6.0 now :) .
  14. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      Urgh. Okay, that's embarrassing.   Moving swiftly on then... back to napkin maths again, because I can't get onto WoD ATM...   1. Assume 5308 av weapon damage & 2864 SP. Ignoring haste & multistrike (for now). 3.45 attack speed. 2. Average SoT swing (no IT glyph) will be 637 damage. Average Censure tick will be 945 at 5 stacks. 3. IT glyph = +40% SoT swing damage, so +255 per swing. 4. Total Censure damage = 4725 over 15 secs. 5. 4.34 swings per 15 secs = +1109 damage. 6. 4.5 sec CD on CS = 3.33... CS swings per 15 secs = +850 damage. 7. Assume 2 TVs per 15 secs = +510 damage. 8. 1109 + 850 + 510 = 2469. 2469 > 2362.5 (ie half of 4725).   Based on this, Immediate Truth will win for single target DPS without the need for any multi-strike attacks. So now we need to know:   1. Does SoT proc off multi-strike attacks? 2a. If so, does it do its full damage? If not, what % of its full damage does it do? 2b. If SoT procs off MS attacks, does the IT glyph multiplier work properly with them? Wouldn't be the first time there's a bug here etc. 3. Can Censure do multi-strikes? Wowpedia says that DoTs can, but need confirmation.
  15. [Ret 6.2 WoD] Retribution Concordance (RetCon)

      At 5 stacks against a dungeoneer's training dummy in my garrison, it was doing 945/946 per tick (2864 SP BTW), so ~4725 dmg over 5 ticks (under 5% haste BTW, so I ignored it for this). Half that is 2362.5.   Meanwhile, a basic SoT strike (no IT glyph) did 625, 621, 692, 607, 616... not great. Let's be generous and assume 700 damage per SoT swing. 700 * 1.4 = 980, for a difference of 280. With an attack speed of 3.45 I can get in 4.34 attacks per 15 secs, so 280 * 4.34 = 1217... about half of the missing Censure damage if I'd used Immediate Truth.   In short, if Blizzard want Immediate Truth to do be a viable glyph, as opposed to one of those "is this a good/bad player?" ones, it should roughly double the damage that Seal of Truth does:   700 SoT damage: +77% to be equal to lost Censure damage. 650 SoT damage: +84% required. 625 SoT damage: +87% required. 600 SoT damage: +91% required.   Back to ignoring Immediate Truth I guess.