Jump to content


Infraction for Rathimis: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Narcosleepy


    It's not you. Really. I hate everyone.

  • ♦ Administrators
  • 8808 posts

Posted 28 December 2010 - 06:28 AM

Post: The Retribution Concordance - 4.0.3a
User: Rathimis
Infraction: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:

This is nothing more than a "rate my super duper untested spec" post in disguise. Feel free to model/test/contemplate it. If you find it to be superior, come tell us about it with logs and sims to back it up.

Original Post:

Has anyone tried/modeled/contemplated: Inq > HoW > CS(if <3 HP) > Exo > TV > CS > J > HW > Cons

The reason I've been doing it this way is probably because I'm Holy and relate CS to HS. It does make sense to me tho.... The holy power generation of CS is 100% and you can't get it back if you push CS back one GCD to cast Exo. The fact that you have a 20% chance to miss an AoW proc on your next melee swing makes me think we should be watching our swing timer?

You might get a DP proc on Exo after the CS, but that gets stored in the buffer, so nothing is lost.

Just a thought I had, it might be worth even more consideration once TV starts beating Exo by a certain %

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users