Jump to content


Photo

Infraction for fip: Mod Sass


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 bartolimu

bartolimu

    palpably superior comprehension

  • Moderators
  • 13,877 posts

Posted 13 April 2009 - 02:33 PM

User: fip
Infraction: Mod Sass
Points: 3

Administrative Note:

Message to User:

Because I said so.

Now you get a week off posting, again, because I said so. Have you noticed a pattern yet?

I got that code from the source at the simcraft website on google. I don't know how I could possibly better check my "sources" on it. If it's incorrect, then let him say so, but why am I receiving an infraction for it? I went through all the code on the google site for them and found it and thought it may be a problem.

Dear fip,

You have received an infraction at Elitist Jerks.

Reason: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.
-------
You'd best check your sources before posting something like that again.
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://elitistjerks....tml#post1188693

It appears that builds including Master Conjurer may not be reflecting the most recent changes:
"Increases the combat ratings gained from your Spellstone and Firestone by 150/300%" old was 15/30%.

spell_stone_t( player_t* player, const std::string& options_str ) :
warlock_spell_t( "spell_stone", player, SCHOOL_FIRE, TREE_DEMONOLOGY )
{
warlock_t* p = player -> cast_warlock();
trigger_gcd = 0;

bonus_haste = ( ( p -> level <= 60 ) ? 30 :
( p -> level <= 66 ) ? 40 :
( p -> level <= 72 ) ? 50 : 60 );

bonus_haste = (int16_t) ( bonus_haste * ( 1.0 + p -> talents.master_conjuror * 0.15 ) );
}

Looks like it's working off the old ratings.


All the best,
Elitist Jerks






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users