Jump to content


Photo

DKP and cross-class parity


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#81 Foxery

Foxery

    Von Kaiser

  • Members
  • 39 posts

Posted 02 February 2007 - 04:22 PM

Same here. Been in two guilds with public bidding and find it works great. So long as you have people that are willing to bid in good faith it's by far the least drama system you can have.

If every player of every guild were mature and reasonable, we wouldn't have long discussions about loot systems. :( Living through some poor systems gave me the pessimistic view that an ideal loot system has two goals: Reward honest players, and avoid abuse by those with... other agendas.

#82 TheOnly

TheOnly

    Don Flamenco

  • Members
  • 302 posts

Posted 02 February 2007 - 09:59 PM

I am in a new guild now and if I see resto druids taking agi/ap/crit gloves or resto shamans taking the same stat chain armour I will be annoyed. In a 5man instance its a bit iffy, but we can run it again straight after so I am not too bothered (be nice to let the DPSer take it first, but really.. meh). In a raid its a BIG no. You can loot it when no other DPS needs it. For now use your pretty damn nice blue quest rewards/dungeon drops. Having said the above, I don't think anyone in the guild would take loot over the raid class that would use it anyways.

What if that agi/ap/crit item is a marginal upgrade for the 'pure' dps class and a HUGE one for the off-class? Prioritizing only until no one in the 'pure' class needs it is equally a problem. There are various levels of 'need' its not a binary situation.

As a DPS caster in an open loot system pre TBC, I never got angry at healers taking stuff that was marginal upgrades for me or my Warlocks (I was class leader). It only bugged me when it was something that was truyly unique and hard to find (say, neltharion's tear) or when it was a gigantic upgrade for someone (say, a new recruit had one crappy item slot that never dropped for them and a huge upgrade became available).

On the other hand, if it was a huge upgrade and the healer bid a small ammount and won it anyway --- sorry but the pure dps class actually has to bid a reasonable ammount and not expect to get good stuff for free. (secret bid variable price with a price floor -- not the best but it worked).

In retrospect, I'm glad our healers got to get dps gear, as we have leveled faster as a guild as a result. I noticed on my server that guilds that restrict loot pre TBC have a huge problem -- all the first level 70's in these guilds tend to be dps classes / specs and have a lack of healers. Our guild's first few 70's included priests, druids, and 2 prot warriors in addition to the mage/hunters as you'd expect. It was nice rolling right off into HFP with a feral druid geared to the teeth and a shadow priest with ~500 + damage... I don't think I could ever join a guild that has draconian closed-loot rules especially with the way hybrids now work in this game. Its a bad idea.

#83 Aphyrax

Aphyrax

    Great Tiger

  • Members
  • 808 posts

Posted 02 February 2007 - 10:23 PM

I am impressed then. I'm fairly sure our system would break horribly if bid weren't silent (our winner only pays what the 2nd highest bid was, not the highest bid, so public would make malicious bleeding very easy). Feel free to reply in a PM since it's off topic, but do you not have a high incidence of people bidding HighestCurrentBid + 1? I'm sure someone in our guild would perceive slights in the order people ramped up bids as well.

I was a guild that used open bidding and in a guild that used secret bidding. Both worked reasonably well. The open bidding system had minimal increments (between 1/2 and 1/5 of the DKP for one raid) and I never encountered a case where the bidding was dragged out to the point of annoyance. If anything there was always cheering when an item went extremely high so it helped lighten the mood.

Second highest+1 is more suitable for silent bidding systems since it alleviates the problem of someone bidding way too much, but I don't think it would be completely horrible for open bidding either. You can never bleed someone dry without their consent since nothing forces me to keep outbidding you.

#84 Aphyrax

Aphyrax

    Great Tiger

  • Members
  • 808 posts

Posted 02 February 2007 - 10:29 PM

In retrospect, I'm glad our healers got to get dps gear, as we have leveled faster as a guild as a result. I noticed on my server that guilds that restrict loot pre TBC have a huge problem -- all the first level 70's in these guilds tend to be dps classes / specs and have a lack of healers. Our guild's first few 70's included priests, druids, and 2 prot warriors in addition to the mage/hunters as you'd expect. It was nice rolling right off into HFP with a feral druid geared to the teeth and a shadow priest with ~500 + damage... I don't think I could ever join a guild that has draconian closed-loot rules especially with the way hybrids now work in this game. Its a bad idea.

I could not agree more. Right now there seems to be a massive shortage of healers. I was on vacation the first 2 weeks after BC launched so I am still far from 70 and last night a friend whispered me with "hurry up and get to 70, we need healers". It was a semi-joke but healers are in tight supply. The number of runs that happen are limited pretty much only by the number of healers on.

The lack of healers was not so obvious a month ago because most dedicated players have multiple 60s and so there was always someone who could bring their healer alt. But right now nobody I know is leveling alts when there is so much new content to explore on your main.

The fact that non-healing specced healer classes are now viable as offspecs only further reduces the number of actual healers. In that situation, being overly strict on your healers will get you nowhere fast. If you are the top guild on the server you can probably get enough people that are willing to be the guild slave for the sake of loot and progress, but if you are a second-tier guild, alienating healers is a surefire way to not be able to fill your raids. Now more so than ever before.

#85 notrachel

notrachel

    Von Kaiser

  • Members
  • 37 posts

Posted 02 February 2007 - 10:37 PM

I levelled playing evenings and weekends with a holy priest (smiter build for levelling) and hit 70 on 24th Jan. There is so much +dmg gear in TBC that I went from +250 dmg to +400 in about a week and solo questing was no problem at all.

#86 Kalman

Kalman

    Super Macho Man

  • Members
  • 8791 posts

Posted 03 February 2007 - 08:31 PM

Kalman, how do you handle priority with newer recruits/large guilds?

It seems like a priority system would work great assuming you have a small group of high attendence people with very low atrition, but would completely breakdown if you have a large playerbase and new recruits. Does a new mage get automatic priority on damage gear over a holy priest who has been in the guild a very long time?

What about respecs? How do they fit into the picture?

The way we do it, which I'm fine with, is that applicants go through three phases. Phase 1, you're an app. If we decide you're not horrible, and we like you, you get an invite and get the tag and all that. Phase 2, you're an initiate. This basically lasts 2-4 weeks, and is designed to show that you're capable of attending raids regularly, holding your own, etc. Phase 3, you're a member.

Member > initiate > app. If you're a member of 1 month and (we'll pretend we're just killing Nef for the purpose of the example) Mish' drops, as long as you're the highest DKP amongst damage casters and want it, it's yours, even if there's a 3 year member priest who'd like it. Full price always beats offspec price, and member > initiate > app. If it's a question of an initiate mage and a member priest, the priest still loses.

Once someone's been around for a month or so, they no longer feel like the FNG, and "losing" gear to them is no longer bothersome. Plus, honestly, most new members go heavily negative during the initiate phase, since there's probably a lot of stuff on rot or near-rot that's still an upgrade for them.

What's this "respec" you speak of? :p

Er, seriously, people generally don't respec for us. If they do, it's been done with consent of the officers, and in my ideal world (note: I'm not an officer, and we use a somewhat different system than the one I would use) a *permanent* respec in role is basically a request to switch mains, and should be treated with the same gravitas. I don't give a shit if you're 61 shadow, as long as you can heal effectively, if healing is your role. Typically during pushes on content, people are pure raid specs, and once stuff has settled down, people drift to whatever.
Melador> Incidentally, these last few pages are why people hate lawyers.
Viator> I really don't want to go all Kalman here.
Bury> Just imagine what the world would be like if you used your powers for good.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users